Wednesday, October 11, 2006

Criticize the Dems, But Don't Lie About How Rotten Republicans Have Become 

Good recap on how Democrats stink on the issue of sexual exploitation and dysfunctionality. However, what Bozell fails to address is how corrupt the Republicans are right now, in exactly the same way. Thanks to their closeted liberalism.

Democrats on sex and children
By Brent Bozell III

After more than 100 stories on ABC, CBS and NBC about the Mark Foley Internet-messaging scandal, it wouldn't be hard for the average Joe to conclude the Democrats are now the Party of Moral Values.

Democrats are demanding that Republicans return the monies Foley gave their campaigns. Nancy Pelosi, the House minority leader who would very much like Denny Hastert's job, is predictably fanning the flames. "We want to know," she thunders, "why the Republicans chose to protect Mark Foley's political career rather than protect the children who were in our charge."


Since when have the Democrats really been the party to protect children from the sexual advances of adults? Let's get to the point: Since when have Democrats like Nancy Pelosi cared, really cared, about men seeking out boys for sex?

There's an organized lobby for this perversion: the National Man-Boy Love Association. In 1997, NAMBLA made national headlines when a 10-year-old Massachusetts boy named Jeffrey Curley was abducted by two men, choked on a gasoline-soaked rag when he wouldn't consent to sex, murdered and then sexually assaulted.

Curley's parents sued NAMBLA, since one of the killers said he was discouraged from following his fiendish desires until the organization encouraged him. The Curleys' lawyer explained how the group instructed perverts on how to lure children into sex, citing a NAMBLA publication he calls "The Rape and Escape Manual." Its actual title is "The Survival Manual: The Man's Guide to Staying Alive in Man-Boy Sexual Relationships."

What does this have to do with the Democrats and Nancy Pelosi? The ever-prescient Mark Levin connected the dots on his radio program. NAMBLA easily found lawyers to defend them against the parents of the murdered boy -- the American Civil Liberties Union. Democrats like Pelosi are demanding that every Republican return any dirty Foley contributions they received, but do you think a single one of them has ever returned a dime generated for their coffers by the ACLU?

The American Spectator reported that in a 2001 "gay pride" parade in San Francisco, Nancy Pelosi was just three spots in the parade from radical gay advocate Harry Hay, who avidly spoke in favor of sex with teens and fiercely advocated for NAMBLA's inclusion in gay-pride parades. Did Pelosi ever protest NAMBLA's presence in parades?

But go back to Pelosi's soundbite, because there's something there that's even more jarring: Since when do ultraliberals like San Fran Nan believe that a 17-year-old is a "child," anyway?

But since many Republicans have adopted the same pro-homo sexual ideology that Pelosi has, any criticism to her and Democrats is just party politics hypocrisy. Get the homos OUT in the Republican party, get the sexual harassers and exploiters OUT, fire everyone who has been covering up for them for decades and then these conservative pundits would be in a non-hypocritical position to criticize the Dems.

And to blame it on "political correctness?" Since when do Republicans have to be arm-twisted by liberals as to what they believe? Since when can't Republicans lead with their own values and attitudes? Since they have become corrupt liberals: pro-homo, pro-porn, pro-sexual exploitation, etc.

The only good thing here is that the Foley scandal draws more attention to this ugly state of affairs with each passing day.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?