Tuesday, April 11, 2006
The ugly mind of a pro-homosexual
As I posted recently, I got into a fight with a disgusting guy at RWS, and I decided I would answer his slurs and ad hominen attacks (which he continued on his blog). He is one of these sexual parasites who puts himself up on a pedestal.
Here is the rest so far:
JD wrote:
=================
Don't tell me I was describing you in my criticisms above? My opinion of you mirrors yours of mine.
Another violent cheap ignorant liberal calling other people vile for breaking up their self-denial party?
alessandra | Homepage | 04.09.06 - 12:34 pm | #
andy wrote to me:
=======================
Oh cmon Andy. Who are you fooling? The more sexual torture you hear about, the more you salivate, the more that sick mind of yours just gets going.
Your dying to hear about ANY sexual abuse aren't you? Sexual abuse really makes you comfortable, doesn't it? Just like your verbal abuse here. it's not others "comfort level" you're worried about. You took back the question because it showed to this little crowd just how sick your mind is. But you came to my blog to post it. Too much of a tripe to show who you really are here? Keeping up the façade to fool RWS?
That's why you can't say two words of any argument without profanity and some sort of verbal aggression. That's what your little homo-obsessive sanctimony amounts to.
As I answered you on my blog, calling on people like you about their violent and irresponsible minds does not require having been abused. It requires knowledge and character. Both of which you are missing.
==================
RWS: But there is a way to make a point without insulting everyone around you.
==================
Apparently that illudes liberals who can't say two words without vommiting the excrement they have between their ears.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.09.06 - 1:14 pm | #
You also endorse sexual promiscuity, don't you, andy? And prostitution?
=================
So Andy, aside from spitting out swearwords in every post, and endorsing varied forms of physical and sexual torture, you haven't yet confirmed how much your mind stinks regarding other sexuality problems such as promiscuity and prostitution.
Cute sanctimonious position you "stand on." Or sink completely through.
This is why pro-homosexuals are obsessive. They have the most stinking minds that denigrate sexuality in every possible way and get on the highest hypocritical high horse.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.09.06 - 1:37 pm | #
andy wrote:
Wonderduck | Homepage | 04.09.06 - 6:47 pm | #
andy with the ugly mind wrote--
+++++++++++++++++
alessandra:
oh look! a liberal vomitting excrement! how cute that you think you call people all kinds of vulgarity every time they ask something you don't like.
And, in case, other people aren't completely ignorant as you are, the question is totally pertinent, given the much higher incident of rectal cancer in male homosexuals. Now what could cause that, I wonder??? Hard to figure out...
That's just how natural homosexuality is.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.07.06 - 6:13 pm | #
================
Anal Cancer: Homosexuals are at increased risk for this rare type of cancer, which is potentially fatal if the anal-rectal tumors metastasize to other bodily organs.
· Dr. Joel Palefsky, a leading expert in the field of anal cancer, reports that while the incidence of anal cancer in the United States is only 0.9/100,000, that number soars to 35/100,000 for homosexuals. That rate doubles again for those who are HIV positive, which, according to Dr. Palefsky, is "roughly ten times higher than the current rate of cervical cancer."[49]
· At the Fourth International AIDS Malignancy Conference at the National Institutes of Health in May, 2000, Dr. Andrew Grulich announced that the incidence of anal cancer among homosexuals with HIV "was raised 37-fold compared with the general population."[50]
50. "Studies Point to Increased Risks of Anal Cancer."
================
andy the slur-thrower wrote:
=================
speak for yourself, you're ignorant, fanatic, and have a putrid little mind.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.11.06 - 7:35 am | #
andy wrote:
===============
Please save your ad hominen attacks.
PRO-homosexuality, PRO-pornography, PRO-prostitution is the problem. Whoever endorses sexual violence, sexual exploitation, sexual dysfunction as healthy is a monster, andy. They can be heterosexual or non-heterosexual, white or black, men or women, young or old, the harm is the same.
I have to say, though, that the day you and all those PRO-sexual-violence people like you are off the surface of the Earth, not only will it smell better, but the world will be less violent.
That's what you amount to.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.11.06 - 7:54 am | #
andy wrote:
==================
It doesn't change the fact that the numbers are tremendously higher for homosexuals and specially those with certain STDs.
It is a FACT.
It is not irrelevant. It shows the extent to which a society that is obsessive with pro-homosexuality will do to lie and deceive people about the problems with homosexuality and its biggest sexual practice.
That's why you have an ugly mind. It's your bigotry that I'm referring to.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.11.06 - 8:15 am | #
RWS wrote:
================
That's right. andy here just thinks that rape, and prostitution, and promiscuity, and the desecration and destruction of everything that is beautiful and sacred and healthy in personal relationships, (which are all a part of SM), like taking a cord and asphixiating people, or burning them with cigarettes, or battering and breaking their bones, or inflicting humiliation and verbal abuse and psychological abuse and terror and enemas and mutilation and renactment of every form of child abuse dynamics in adults is just fine.
He's such a good person! After all the above, he adds that doesn't think child abuse is right. What a lofty mind he has.
An example: there is a boy being raped to death by some homo monster is andy here is like "Oh yeah, that may not be right, because they are under 18." But it just goes on, because little pro-homo shits NEVER take action or speak out against it. Have you ever heard andy here speak out on how homos abuse adolescent boys? He's too much of piece of garbage to do that (and so is every other pro-homo that thinks like him).
Continuing the story, so the boy is being abused, for years on end, and he gets so destroyed inside that he doesn't know anymore what it is to have mental health. And andy here is just salivating until this boy turns 18, because then he is not a "child" anymore and andy can say in his most vile and devious mind, 'oh look, SM time, I'm going to rape you till you die and burn you with cigarettes and that's because you like it! And yeah, it's a free country! God bless American and freedom fighters like me. Oh, and Alessandra, you are a pile of shit because you don't clap at all of this.'
You pro-homosexuals have such ugly minds.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.11.06 - 8:17 am | #
andy wrote:
==================
that's because you don't stop anyone from perpetrating any kind of sexual violence, exploitation, or harassment.
"people like you that force it into the dark corners of society. "
Another one of your strawmen distortions. I haven't written that, so try arguing something I wrote.
And try reading up on how destroyed the emotional lives prostitutes are before you post here again. Not to mention the history of substance and alcohol abuse. The same with a lot of porn people.
Oh I forget, I'm talking to someone who favors sexual torture of people, you wouldn't be able to grasp what I am talking about here, like having a human heart.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.11.06 - 8:27 am | #
JD wrote:
JD | 04.08.06 - 9:26 am | #
===================
Maybe you oughta take that bloated head of yours out of the sand and hear what child abusers say when they are abusing children.
You've never heard of that before have, you? Oh I forget, that's not vile for people like you.
Or when pimps are battering and raping prostitutes. You don't think that's very vile.
Or when there is one more incident of domestic violence that ends up in spouse murder. Not very vile, is it?
Or when another teenager is raped on a date. Or when some sadistic garbage decides to sexually torture another human being for fun; or when every form of deviant behavior is touted as fun on video games or the largest and most profuse database of every type of vile and violent sexual attitudes, values, and behaviors, which is pornography.
Well, for a deaf and dumb and alienated piece of garbage like you, I'm sure the most "vile" thing your sick mind has ever managed to take notice of is a question if a rectal colon cancer guy is a homosexual. And given that homosexuals do have higher rates of colon cancer, just like miners have higher rates of lung disease, your characterisation of the question as vile is nothing but a hate post, an ad hominen attack.
You pro-homosexuals have such ugly minds.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.11.06 - 8:30 am | #
andy wrote:
andy
================
Any sick and violent minded person who is looking for support has found the right blog! hahahahh
all you child rapists, molesters, the adult sickos, pimps, spouse batterers, pornographers, come one and all to RWS's!
As long as you don't ask about ugly FACTS regarding homosexuals and disease, they will give you all their support and more, there may be money to be made. Right here.
If you are selling your stuff, lots of opportunity, given that here is the blog of the free, the liberated, the pergrassives!
(and they call other people extremists!! ooh boogie man!!)
alessandra | Homepage | 04.11.06 - 8:39 am | #
andy wrote:
===================
Speaking of yourself?
What are you trying to achieve here but control? You want no accountability for destructive, violent behavior (physical, psychological and sexual). You are a total parasite.
"You're both the worst kind of moral offender, thinking you have the right to dictate to others how they should live; "
I do have the right to tell child abusers, rapists, torturers, and all others who perpetrate violence that not only they aren't healthy, they don't belong in society.
It is my right not to live in a violent pigsty.
It is my right to protect other people from your monstrous attitudes which then engender and ensure a very violent society.
It is my right to care and not to be a sexual insensitive nazi like you.
"You're a little dictator-wanna-be spouting off on the net."
It is also my right to expose how ugly your mind is even though you try to camouflage it behind a discourse of freedom and rights.
Sexuality is an ugly affair in the world right now. So many putrid people with such harmful views, so active in destroying everything that is precious.
In his blog, he just continued to write a bunch of slander and distorted crap about what I had written. Total hate post. So I left some comments. He's too dishonest to argue any topic without shoving a whole load of ad hominen attacks.
andy wrote:
========================
Embrace like this?
rape, and prostitution, and promiscuity, and the desecration and destruction of everything that is beautiful and sacred and healthy in personal relationships, (which are all a part of SM) like taking a cord and asphixiating people, or burning them with cigarettes, or battering and breaking their bones, or inflicting humiliation and verbal abuse and psychological abuse and terror and enemas and mutilation and renactment of every form of child abuse dynamics in adults and thinking it is just fine?
That's how he embraced people?
alessandra | Homepage | 04.11.06 - 7:33 am | #
andy wrote:
============================
You really can't argue anything I write without lying about it, I suppose.
Go back and read your statements at RWS regarding how you totally endorse the sexual torture of people in SM. It's what you told us: you endorse (and therefore promote) sexual torture, and you endorse sexual exploitation through prostitution and pornography. (this is what I wrote)
What you do in that little life of yours, with the views you have above, who knows. Whether you do it yourself, or whether you just endorse every other person who is doing some form of exploitation or violence, we don't know. That's because you don't have a "narrow" sexuality. And other people who don't endorse sexual violence are the twats. That's your mental health.
And then he adds this:
That's a reference to the SM discussion and how normalized sexual violence is in the world today, which he completely quoted out of context.
For andy, not having a mind that totally normalizes and legitimizes sexual violence and denigration in porn is being crazy.
His main ad hominen attacks focus on trying to slander me as "crazy," "narrow/prude" (on sexuality), against "sexual freedom," and "homophobe."
It's totally related to what I commented in the beginning of another comment thread below (with Dave's comments). Michael posted about multi-player porn gaming and he commented:
oh, and what you just said here “Call me a prude, but this really strikes me as unhealthy” is really at the heart of how a really shoddy (and vicious) liberal culture manipulates men (and more and more women) into endorsing a lot of sexual deviance and violence. All of this in order to fool themselves as being (falsely) sexually hip or, in the case of men, as macho/masculine. Otherwise they get tarred and feathered as “prudes,” “afraid of sex,” “wimpy,” “not masculine enough,” etc etc. At the same time, the liberal crap all clothe themselves as “liberated,” “full of ‘masculine’ status playboys (and pimps),” and “sexually avant-garde.”
The result is that at the core of this culture, decency, trust, intimacy, and responsibility are getting more and more distant from sexuality (and, consequently, from the fundamental basis for a personal relationship).
15. Dave in Texas wrote to alessandra - April 9, 2006
Dave, I find your characterisation of what I say as “hate” just vile, it’s an ad hominen attack.
I’m not interested in getting into a fight with you, for all your rants and attacks on what I am expressing. Your rants are cowardly and misguided, and not at all Christian. People who shove their heads in the sand and do nothing about evil desecrate God’s creation in every way. That’s not what Christiniaty is about.
I also really despise people who use Christianity (or any religion) to make excuses for themselves. It is a total desecration of the fundamental goodness of any religion. Lots of “religious” people love to use their religion to make excuses for being irresponsible, not caring, for going along with and consequently promoting evil, for not holding accountable people who practice violence and destruction in the world, not to mention when they are not the perpetrators themselves.
The only thing that is needed for evil to flourish in the world is for good people to do nothing. At the end of the day, this is what you will have to show for yourself.
Here is the rest so far:
JD wrote:
alessandra : You are perhaps one of the most vile, insulting, sanctimounious asses that we have seen around here.
Andy, sorry for your loss.
JD
=================
Don't tell me I was describing you in my criticisms above? My opinion of you mirrors yours of mine.
Another violent cheap ignorant liberal calling other people vile for breaking up their self-denial party?
alessandra | Homepage | 04.09.06 - 12:34 pm | #
andy wrote to me:
you worthless sack of shit disguised as a human being.
you are an examplar of what is wrong with humanity, a walking genetic defect whose dad should have kept his dick in his pants and spare the world such a stinking twat of a woman.
a complete dipshit
racist asshole,
the fucktard , you damnable idiot?
RWS, my profuse apologies for my language.
RWS - I rescind my question on the sexual abuse. To bring up the subject is unfair to others who might not be comfortable with the topic for whatever reason.
=======================
Oh cmon Andy. Who are you fooling? The more sexual torture you hear about, the more you salivate, the more that sick mind of yours just gets going.
Your dying to hear about ANY sexual abuse aren't you? Sexual abuse really makes you comfortable, doesn't it? Just like your verbal abuse here. it's not others "comfort level" you're worried about. You took back the question because it showed to this little crowd just how sick your mind is. But you came to my blog to post it. Too much of a tripe to show who you really are here? Keeping up the façade to fool RWS?
That's why you can't say two words of any argument without profanity and some sort of verbal aggression. That's what your little homo-obsessive sanctimony amounts to.
As I answered you on my blog, calling on people like you about their violent and irresponsible minds does not require having been abused. It requires knowledge and character. Both of which you are missing.
==================
RWS: But there is a way to make a point without insulting everyone around you.
==================
Apparently that illudes liberals who can't say two words without vommiting the excrement they have between their ears.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.09.06 - 1:14 pm | #
You also endorse sexual promiscuity, don't you, andy? And prostitution?
=================
So Andy, aside from spitting out swearwords in every post, and endorsing varied forms of physical and sexual torture, you haven't yet confirmed how much your mind stinks regarding other sexuality problems such as promiscuity and prostitution.
Cute sanctimonious position you "stand on." Or sink completely through.
This is why pro-homosexuals are obsessive. They have the most stinking minds that denigrate sexuality in every possible way and get on the highest hypocritical high horse.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.09.06 - 1:37 pm | #
andy wrote:
andy | Homepage | 04.09.06 - 2:06 pm | #
alessandra -
No, I rescined the question because, at the time, I felt it was not appropriate. Now that you've continued your irrational blathering, I have little problem asking it, because I think it would help others to know just what made your mind go so wonky somewhere along the way.
As for your other questions:
a) I'm not promiscuous; I'm not going to stop others from being so.
b) I don't frequent prostitutes; I'm not going to stop others from doing so. It's a violent and dangerous profession because of people like you that force it into the dark corners of society. Legalize it, regulate it, and you'd have nothing to rant about.
You're quite possibly the most amusing idiot I've met on the internet.
This will pain you to hear, but you're no different from a far lefty liberal - you both want to control the lives and livelihoods of others, just by different means. You're both the worst kind of moral offender, thinking you have the right to dictate to others how they should live; to tell them that what they own, from their money (the lefty liberal) to their body (the crazy conservative), is not theirs and that you know better how it should be used. You're a little dictator-wanna-be spouting off on the net.
(P.S. I voted for Dubya - go figure that one out. I suspect you can't, given your us vs them, black/white, simpleminded mentality that makes my 3 yr old look like a genius).
Sparkly, you wonder why I don't comment here much anymore? Take a look at the above.
Wonderduck | Homepage | 04.09.06 - 6:47 pm | #
Sorry, Wonderduck, but when someone wants to use my dead friend, not even in the ground yet, as some kind of justification for their bigotry, I'm not going to be nice about it.andy | Homepage | 04.09.06 - 7:29 pm | #
Andy, it isn't you I'm talking about. Your comments are completely understandable under the circumstances.Wonderduck | Homepage | 04.09.06 - 10:07 pm | #
Oh, nevermind then.andy | Homepage | 04.09.06 - 11:24 pm | #
andy with the ugly mind wrote--
That you even think such a question is remotely funny, let alone appropriate, is an indicator that you are an examplar of what is wrong with humanity, a walking genetic defect whose dad should have kept his dick in his pants and spare the world such a stinking twat of a woman.
+++++++++++++++++
alessandra:
oh look! a liberal vomitting excrement! how cute that you think you call people all kinds of vulgarity every time they ask something you don't like.
And, in case, other people aren't completely ignorant as you are, the question is totally pertinent, given the much higher incident of rectal cancer in male homosexuals. Now what could cause that, I wonder??? Hard to figure out...
That's just how natural homosexuality is.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.07.06 - 6:13 pm | #
================
Anal Cancer: Homosexuals are at increased risk for this rare type of cancer, which is potentially fatal if the anal-rectal tumors metastasize to other bodily organs.
· Dr. Joel Palefsky, a leading expert in the field of anal cancer, reports that while the incidence of anal cancer in the United States is only 0.9/100,000, that number soars to 35/100,000 for homosexuals. That rate doubles again for those who are HIV positive, which, according to Dr. Palefsky, is "roughly ten times higher than the current rate of cervical cancer."[49]
· At the Fourth International AIDS Malignancy Conference at the National Institutes of Health in May, 2000, Dr. Andrew Grulich announced that the incidence of anal cancer among homosexuals with HIV "was raised 37-fold compared with the general population."[50]
50. "Studies Point to Increased Risks of Anal Cancer."
================
andy the slur-thrower wrote:
You're quite possibly the most amusing idiot I've met on the internet.
=================
speak for yourself, you're ignorant, fanatic, and have a putrid little mind.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.11.06 - 7:35 am | #
andy wrote:
It's not just the question being asked, it's the fucktard doing the asking. Christ, if he was gay you'd probably be tap dancing on his grave, huh, you damnable idiot?
===============
Please save your ad hominen attacks.
PRO-homosexuality, PRO-pornography, PRO-prostitution is the problem. Whoever endorses sexual violence, sexual exploitation, sexual dysfunction as healthy is a monster, andy. They can be heterosexual or non-heterosexual, white or black, men or women, young or old, the harm is the same.
I have to say, though, that the day you and all those PRO-sexual-violence people like you are off the surface of the Earth, not only will it smell better, but the world will be less violent.
That's what you amount to.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.11.06 - 7:54 am | #
andy wrote:
Yes, colorectal cancers are higher among homosexual men. However, the most recent documents at pubmed indicate that insufficient work has been done to determine the role of STDs and HIV in this fact.
==================
It doesn't change the fact that the numbers are tremendously higher for homosexuals and specially those with certain STDs.
It is a FACT.
It is not irrelevant. It shows the extent to which a society that is obsessive with pro-homosexuality will do to lie and deceive people about the problems with homosexuality and its biggest sexual practice.
That's why you have an ugly mind. It's your bigotry that I'm referring to.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.11.06 - 8:15 am | #
RWS wrote:
I think I can say without a doubt that andy does not approve of homosexuals or bi sexuals abusing young boys.
================
That's right. andy here just thinks that rape, and prostitution, and promiscuity, and the desecration and destruction of everything that is beautiful and sacred and healthy in personal relationships, (which are all a part of SM), like taking a cord and asphixiating people, or burning them with cigarettes, or battering and breaking their bones, or inflicting humiliation and verbal abuse and psychological abuse and terror and enemas and mutilation and renactment of every form of child abuse dynamics in adults is just fine.
He's such a good person! After all the above, he adds that doesn't think child abuse is right. What a lofty mind he has.
An example: there is a boy being raped to death by some homo monster is andy here is like "Oh yeah, that may not be right, because they are under 18." But it just goes on, because little pro-homo shits NEVER take action or speak out against it. Have you ever heard andy here speak out on how homos abuse adolescent boys? He's too much of piece of garbage to do that (and so is every other pro-homo that thinks like him).
Continuing the story, so the boy is being abused, for years on end, and he gets so destroyed inside that he doesn't know anymore what it is to have mental health. And andy here is just salivating until this boy turns 18, because then he is not a "child" anymore and andy can say in his most vile and devious mind, 'oh look, SM time, I'm going to rape you till you die and burn you with cigarettes and that's because you like it! And yeah, it's a free country! God bless American and freedom fighters like me. Oh, and Alessandra, you are a pile of shit because you don't clap at all of this.'
You pro-homosexuals have such ugly minds.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.11.06 - 8:17 am | #
andy wrote:
b) I don't frequent prostitutes; I'm not going to stop others from doing so. It's a violent and dangerous profession because of people like you that force it into the dark corners of society. Legalize it, regulate it, and you'd have nothing to rant about.
==================
that's because you don't stop anyone from perpetrating any kind of sexual violence, exploitation, or harassment.
"people like you that force it into the dark corners of society. "
Another one of your strawmen distortions. I haven't written that, so try arguing something I wrote.
And try reading up on how destroyed the emotional lives prostitutes are before you post here again. Not to mention the history of substance and alcohol abuse. The same with a lot of porn people.
Oh I forget, I'm talking to someone who favors sexual torture of people, you wouldn't be able to grasp what I am talking about here, like having a human heart.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.11.06 - 8:27 am | #
JD wrote:
alessandra : You are perhaps one of the most vile, insulting, sanctimounious asses that we have seen around here.
Andy, sorry for your loss.
JD | 04.08.06 - 9:26 am | #
===================
Maybe you oughta take that bloated head of yours out of the sand and hear what child abusers say when they are abusing children.
You've never heard of that before have, you? Oh I forget, that's not vile for people like you.
Or when pimps are battering and raping prostitutes. You don't think that's very vile.
Or when there is one more incident of domestic violence that ends up in spouse murder. Not very vile, is it?
Or when another teenager is raped on a date. Or when some sadistic garbage decides to sexually torture another human being for fun; or when every form of deviant behavior is touted as fun on video games or the largest and most profuse database of every type of vile and violent sexual attitudes, values, and behaviors, which is pornography.
Well, for a deaf and dumb and alienated piece of garbage like you, I'm sure the most "vile" thing your sick mind has ever managed to take notice of is a question if a rectal colon cancer guy is a homosexual. And given that homosexuals do have higher rates of colon cancer, just like miners have higher rates of lung disease, your characterisation of the question as vile is nothing but a hate post, an ad hominen attack.
You pro-homosexuals have such ugly minds.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.11.06 - 8:30 am | #
andy wrote:
JD - thanks for your support.
andy
================
Any sick and violent minded person who is looking for support has found the right blog! hahahahh
all you child rapists, molesters, the adult sickos, pimps, spouse batterers, pornographers, come one and all to RWS's!
As long as you don't ask about ugly FACTS regarding homosexuals and disease, they will give you all their support and more, there may be money to be made. Right here.
If you are selling your stuff, lots of opportunity, given that here is the blog of the free, the liberated, the pergrassives!
(and they call other people extremists!! ooh boogie man!!)
alessandra | Homepage | 04.11.06 - 8:39 am | #
andy wrote:
This will pain you to hear, but you're no different from a far lefty liberal - you both want to control the lives and livelihoods of others, just by different means.
===================
Speaking of yourself?
What are you trying to achieve here but control? You want no accountability for destructive, violent behavior (physical, psychological and sexual). You are a total parasite.
"You're both the worst kind of moral offender, thinking you have the right to dictate to others how they should live; "
I do have the right to tell child abusers, rapists, torturers, and all others who perpetrate violence that not only they aren't healthy, they don't belong in society.
It is my right not to live in a violent pigsty.
It is my right to protect other people from your monstrous attitudes which then engender and ensure a very violent society.
It is my right to care and not to be a sexual insensitive nazi like you.
"You're a little dictator-wanna-be spouting off on the net."
It is also my right to expose how ugly your mind is even though you try to camouflage it behind a discourse of freedom and rights.
Sexuality is an ugly affair in the world right now. So many putrid people with such harmful views, so active in destroying everything that is precious.
In his blog, he just continued to write a bunch of slander and distorted crap about what I had written. Total hate post. So I left some comments. He's too dishonest to argue any topic without shoving a whole load of ad hominen attacks.
andy wrote:
No, you worthless sack of shit disguised as a human being. He was a happily married newlywed to a beautiful bride. He was generous and compassionate and accepted everyone regardless of who they were. He was the kind of person you could hold up as an example for us all, on how we should live and treat one another and embrace life to the fullest.
========================
Embrace like this?
rape, and prostitution, and promiscuity, and the desecration and destruction of everything that is beautiful and sacred and healthy in personal relationships, (which are all a part of SM) like taking a cord and asphixiating people, or burning them with cigarettes, or battering and breaking their bones, or inflicting humiliation and verbal abuse and psychological abuse and terror and enemas and mutilation and renactment of every form of child abuse dynamics in adults and thinking it is just fine?
That's how he embraced people?
alessandra | Homepage | 04.11.06 - 7:33 am | #
andy wrote:
I'm still not a sex abuser, despite alessandra's bizarre thoughts on the matter).
============================
You really can't argue anything I write without lying about it, I suppose.
Go back and read your statements at RWS regarding how you totally endorse the sexual torture of people in SM. It's what you told us: you endorse (and therefore promote) sexual torture, and you endorse sexual exploitation through prostitution and pornography. (this is what I wrote)
What you do in that little life of yours, with the views you have above, who knows. Whether you do it yourself, or whether you just endorse every other person who is doing some form of exploitation or violence, we don't know. That's because you don't have a "narrow" sexuality. And other people who don't endorse sexual violence are the twats. That's your mental health.
And then he adds this:
Update 2: The prosecution presents into evidence this post in support of the accusation that alessandra is a whackjob:
If [Hitler] were alive today, and if he couldn´t find his way in some military, secret police system, I have no doubt he could become a substantial millionaire, building an empire of violent pornography, using people of all ages, including children.
Yup, that just reeks of sanity, doesn't it?
That's a reference to the SM discussion and how normalized sexual violence is in the world today, which he completely quoted out of context.
For andy, not having a mind that totally normalizes and legitimizes sexual violence and denigration in porn is being crazy.
His main ad hominen attacks focus on trying to slander me as "crazy," "narrow/prude" (on sexuality), against "sexual freedom," and "homophobe."
It's totally related to what I commented in the beginning of another comment thread below (with Dave's comments). Michael posted about multi-player porn gaming and he commented:
This is not just porn - we’re talking about interactive multi-player gaming.
Call me a prude, but this really strikes me as unhealthy. I mean, it’s one thing to flirt with Lipstick in a comment thread. Quite another to engage in simulated sex with an on-screen caricature of someone who you know absolutely nothing about. Creeps will be coming out of the woodwork in droves to sign up for this.
oh, and what you just said here “Call me a prude, but this really strikes me as unhealthy” is really at the heart of how a really shoddy (and vicious) liberal culture manipulates men (and more and more women) into endorsing a lot of sexual deviance and violence. All of this in order to fool themselves as being (falsely) sexually hip or, in the case of men, as macho/masculine. Otherwise they get tarred and feathered as “prudes,” “afraid of sex,” “wimpy,” “not masculine enough,” etc etc. At the same time, the liberal crap all clothe themselves as “liberated,” “full of ‘masculine’ status playboys (and pimps),” and “sexually avant-garde.”
The result is that at the core of this culture, decency, trust, intimacy, and responsibility are getting more and more distant from sexuality (and, consequently, from the fundamental basis for a personal relationship).
15. Dave in Texas wrote to alessandra - April 9, 2006
Where we clash is if you are a Christian, your behavior and comments are judgemental. So you and me are fightin over the Word. Cause that’s not our prerogative, even if they’re heavily financed.
If you’re not, then distance yourself from us. Because you’re kind of hate is harmful to the Kingdom.
Dave, I find your characterisation of what I say as “hate” just vile, it’s an ad hominen attack.
I’m not interested in getting into a fight with you, for all your rants and attacks on what I am expressing. Your rants are cowardly and misguided, and not at all Christian. People who shove their heads in the sand and do nothing about evil desecrate God’s creation in every way. That’s not what Christiniaty is about.
I also really despise people who use Christianity (or any religion) to make excuses for themselves. It is a total desecration of the fundamental goodness of any religion. Lots of “religious” people love to use their religion to make excuses for being irresponsible, not caring, for going along with and consequently promoting evil, for not holding accountable people who practice violence and destruction in the world, not to mention when they are not the perpetrators themselves.
The only thing that is needed for evil to flourish in the world is for good people to do nothing. At the end of the day, this is what you will have to show for yourself.
Comments:
Oh for Christ's sake. It's "ad hominem." The rest of your smug, sanctimonious drivel isn't worth replying to. In fact, I think I'm a little dumber for having read it.
# posted by 
: 9:37 PM
: 9:37 PM
After wasting the last several minutes of my life reading this, I have nothing other to say than I feel very sorry for you. I hope one day you will be able to get over your intense anger and realize how truly wrong you are.
P.S. 1)Just because someone is a pedophile that doesn't make them a homosexual. 2)You criticize others for their language but yours is anything but clean. Practice what you preach!
P.S. 1)Just because someone is a pedophile that doesn't make them a homosexual. 2)You criticize others for their language but yours is anything but clean. Practice what you preach!
P.S. 1)Just because someone is a pedophile that doesn't make them a homosexual.
=========================
D'oh. If you want to comment on what is written here, you could learn to read. Please don't just forge false statements so you have something to criticize, that's a bit vile, you know.
=========================
D'oh. If you want to comment on what is written here, you could learn to read. Please don't just forge false statements so you have something to criticize, that's a bit vile, you know.
Tom a dit...
And why on earth do you have two comment mechanisms?
======================
because blogger works poorly, so I added halo.
but you have to check the box every time to disable it, so some posts end up with two.
And why on earth do you have two comment mechanisms?
======================
because blogger works poorly, so I added halo.
but you have to check the box every time to disable it, so some posts end up with two.
realize how truly wrong you are.
===============================
speaking of sanctimonious "I am right and you are wrong..." which doesn't really address anything...
Post a Comment
===============================
speaking of sanctimonious "I am right and you are wrong..." which doesn't really address anything...
