Saturday, January 01, 2005
Down-Low and AIDS questions
In one of many such articles on the down-low thing, TIME TO FACE UP TO 'DOWN-LOW', some stats and numbers come up:
To me, it´s just amazing how society is in denial about how diseased the minds of so many GLBT are. What kind of a person (thinking of their mindset and values) goes out to have unprotected sex, the type of sex where they have a high risk of catching AIDS, when there isn´t a single person in the nation who has not heard of AIDS by now and doesn´t know how one gets it, they do it, they catch it, and they pass the death sentence to their *wives*? *girlfriends*? ahem, the people they are supposed to respect and care for? I feel sorry (in an empathic way) to the black women that have been stuck with this trash while wanting a man. In another article, another black woman who finally woke up to the problem said, " I have always been tolerant of all lifestyles... " That´s what you get for being stupidly tolerant. AIDS.
For this bisexual and gay trash, murder is just too little to stand in the way for these people to get their sexual kicks. They must have it any way and to hell with giving AIDS (and very likely death) to the women they stick it with. Can people have a more diseased sexual mind than this? How diseased is this so-called tolerant, liberal, homosexist society!
The guy who went on Oprah said, in this "I´m such a victim of intolerance" tone, "the black community is so homophobic, they have to understand that a down-low is just a brother who likes to have sex with another brother..." Like, aww how cute. He forgot to add, " and murder a few sisters with AIDS cause he can´t help his homo desires"...
Authorities have been churning out stats for AIDS in black women for quite some time. If the AIDS was not coming from drug use, nor prostitution, was there not a single health authority who figured out the source? Oh... maybe there was, and maybe because it was the GBLT people, the people liberals love to kiss-ass and pretend they are victims who don´t do any crimes, mum´s the word. Sad to see the lives of black women are worth nothing for a liberal, pro-homosexual society.
The second major news that came with the down-low hoopla is that it´s been going on for a long time - and, just like any other aspect of the ugly truth regarding diseased and violent attitudes and behaviors from GBLT´s, even though it´s been happening for a long time, no one was talking about it. Denial, always denial, that is a pro-homosexual society.
But other questions come to mind, regarding the US:
- why the high AIDS rates with *black* women ONLY?
- are there more bisexual black men than other raced men?
- are there the same number of bisexual men across races, but black men have a more diseased mind - thus, they can care less about AIDS?
- why do authorities still keep asking people what they identify with instead of trying to find out what they really are? (this refers to the fact that most bisexual black men insist they are straight - and that goes for plenty other bisexuals - which is why most stats on how many bisexual people are in society are usually wrong, because they are based on "identification" illusions, not reality)
- is it possible that a woman cannot tell if a man is bisexual? Can he trick her by repeatedly and profound lying to her? (I don´t have a totally decided position on this issue, but I do wonder if you start to get to know someone more intimately, and you are not into being fooled, as opposed to the women who are into being in denial for whatever reasons, if a man could fool you he´s not straight)
The identity question is something that has baffled me for a long time. Such is the lack of professionalism in the health/psycho sciences today, because of its homosexism. Imagine your typical pro-homosexual social worker interviewing a bi black man who says he is straight. The social worker, kissing ass to this deity of "what is your identification" nonsense, doesn´t go into any of the issues that could be happening if this is just another diseased bisexual person. And then when he gives AIDS to 5 other women, the social worker, will say, " But what could I have done? He told me he identified as straight! I respect people and their identifications, I´m so progressive! If gazillions of people identify wrongly, that´s not my problem."
- 72 percent of all recent HIV cases among women in the United States are among black women.
- The HIV-infected women are not mostly prostitutes or intravenous drug users with high-risk lifestyles. Many are ordinary black women: secretaries and lawyers, teachers and social workers, artists and actresses, sales clerks and brokers, college students and police officers -- women of varied socioeconomic backgrounds who married or dated black men who secretly have sex with other men, according to researchers, media accounts and AIDS groups.
To me, it´s just amazing how society is in denial about how diseased the minds of so many GLBT are. What kind of a person (thinking of their mindset and values) goes out to have unprotected sex, the type of sex where they have a high risk of catching AIDS, when there isn´t a single person in the nation who has not heard of AIDS by now and doesn´t know how one gets it, they do it, they catch it, and they pass the death sentence to their *wives*? *girlfriends*? ahem, the people they are supposed to respect and care for? I feel sorry (in an empathic way) to the black women that have been stuck with this trash while wanting a man. In another article, another black woman who finally woke up to the problem said, " I have always been tolerant of all lifestyles... " That´s what you get for being stupidly tolerant. AIDS.
For this bisexual and gay trash, murder is just too little to stand in the way for these people to get their sexual kicks. They must have it any way and to hell with giving AIDS (and very likely death) to the women they stick it with. Can people have a more diseased sexual mind than this? How diseased is this so-called tolerant, liberal, homosexist society!
The guy who went on Oprah said, in this "I´m such a victim of intolerance" tone, "the black community is so homophobic, they have to understand that a down-low is just a brother who likes to have sex with another brother..." Like, aww how cute. He forgot to add, " and murder a few sisters with AIDS cause he can´t help his homo desires"...
Authorities have been churning out stats for AIDS in black women for quite some time. If the AIDS was not coming from drug use, nor prostitution, was there not a single health authority who figured out the source? Oh... maybe there was, and maybe because it was the GBLT people, the people liberals love to kiss-ass and pretend they are victims who don´t do any crimes, mum´s the word. Sad to see the lives of black women are worth nothing for a liberal, pro-homosexual society.
The second major news that came with the down-low hoopla is that it´s been going on for a long time - and, just like any other aspect of the ugly truth regarding diseased and violent attitudes and behaviors from GBLT´s, even though it´s been happening for a long time, no one was talking about it. Denial, always denial, that is a pro-homosexual society.
But other questions come to mind, regarding the US:
- why the high AIDS rates with *black* women ONLY?
- are there more bisexual black men than other raced men?
- are there the same number of bisexual men across races, but black men have a more diseased mind - thus, they can care less about AIDS?
- why do authorities still keep asking people what they identify with instead of trying to find out what they really are? (this refers to the fact that most bisexual black men insist they are straight - and that goes for plenty other bisexuals - which is why most stats on how many bisexual people are in society are usually wrong, because they are based on "identification" illusions, not reality)
- is it possible that a woman cannot tell if a man is bisexual? Can he trick her by repeatedly and profound lying to her? (I don´t have a totally decided position on this issue, but I do wonder if you start to get to know someone more intimately, and you are not into being fooled, as opposed to the women who are into being in denial for whatever reasons, if a man could fool you he´s not straight)
The identity question is something that has baffled me for a long time. Such is the lack of professionalism in the health/psycho sciences today, because of its homosexism. Imagine your typical pro-homosexual social worker interviewing a bi black man who says he is straight. The social worker, kissing ass to this deity of "what is your identification" nonsense, doesn´t go into any of the issues that could be happening if this is just another diseased bisexual person. And then when he gives AIDS to 5 other women, the social worker, will say, " But what could I have done? He told me he identified as straight! I respect people and their identifications, I´m so progressive! If gazillions of people identify wrongly, that´s not my problem."
Comments:
Post a Comment
