Sunday, November 07, 2004
Dems scrambling to find a new message to trick red voters
From the Washington Times
A new flurry of comments/articles has emerged after the big loss. The Dems hate the mass of middle America reds, they think they are stupid, supersticious faith-based simpleheads. They differ on fundamental positions. However, in order to be majority and have more political clout, they (the Dems) need the red votes (the people they so despise). So, they seem now, after the big loss, to be scrambling to figure out a way in the next elections to couch their political campaign messages in words that will trick the reds in voting for a party that does not stand for their issues.
"The party just has to have a better message and a new set of messengers and strengthen the grass-roots operation that we built this year," he said. "The next target, the next focus of politics has to be stopping the Bush agenda and making the Bush agenda an issue in the congressional elections." Roger Hickey, co-director of Campaign for America's Future, a liberal grass-roots advocacy organization.
A new flurry of comments/articles has emerged after the big loss. The Dems hate the mass of middle America reds, they think they are stupid, supersticious faith-based simpleheads. They differ on fundamental positions. However, in order to be majority and have more political clout, they (the Dems) need the red votes (the people they so despise). So, they seem now, after the big loss, to be scrambling to figure out a way in the next elections to couch their political campaign messages in words that will trick the reds in voting for a party that does not stand for their issues.
Comments:
Post a Comment
