<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Sunday, August 22, 2004

Consequences of Losing the Culture War 

This significant letter by Paul Weyrich clinches on so many of the most crucial problems in society today, it´s kind of amazing how he got it all in so little space. It will merit more written reflections in the future, for now, some initial thoughts only. Basically it addresses the problem that conservatives have won on political elections and lost the culture war. Therefore, it makes this political win more meaningless with each passing day.



I think this profound loss in the cultural sphere is being felt more and more with each passing day. Given that it didn´t happen overnight, and it is a war, not some smooth transition, it has taken people time to react and start devising strategies. Although it is a profound loss, it has at least served to show conservatives how important the personal sphere is. I wouldn´t want to go back to a Stepford Wives conservative scenario, which was highly oppressive and full of problems, but I certainly don´t want to live in today´s oppressive pigsty, with this garbage of homosexuals and bisexuals and the legitimation of homosexuality (in all its most dysfunctional modes) as normal, sexually degenerate/violent people, people who spit on respect and commitment regarding relationships, etc., dominating education, law, social relations.

It used to be that conservatives suppressed the truth on sexual violence, on the problems of pornography, on adultery/battering, on child abuse, on homosexuality. Now, some of them, much more than liberals, fight to get rid of the stuff and protect society from it. Liberals, who in diverse social movements led the way to making society aware of a lot of problems for women, children, sexual violence and abuse, are now the enforcers and legitimizers of a lot of dysfunctional, harmful, violent attitudes and behaviors which result not only in a very sleazy culture, but which is automatically then played out in how people act towards others.



I don´t think the current liberal, sleazy, dysfunctional dominant culture can be appropriately labeled Marxist, since, although I have hardly read Marx, the little I´ve read about him doesn´t really point in this direction. I´m not sure what Marx thought about child abuse, battering, homosexuality, pornography, prostitution, etc, but I think he was more neglectful than outright endorsing such things. I do vaguely remember having seen criticism that he was very sexist, but that was probably the extent of his thinking into these social issues.

To say that sleaze has been a fabrication of communism, therefore the "Marxism" label, is also not appropriate. The greatest sleaze "manufacturers" right now are all capitalist and liberal.

One cannot escape from seeing how hostile this capitalist/liberal culture is, how totalitarian, hypocritical, and self-serving it is, how McCarthyist it operates.

It used to be that Christianity dominated the religious/cultural scenario in the US, and so, conservatives could live under the illusion that religion pluralism was possible without major clashes in society, and that the separation of church and state would still allow them to live out their values. No more.

Having studied religion from an anthropological perspective, it has always been very clear to me how “liberalism” is very much a religion, if we consider some of the basic functions of religions in their respective societies. Religions tell people what is right and wrong, good and bad, what is allowed and what is forbidden, what reality is and isn´t. It gives them an explanation to social and individual problems. “Liberalism” does all of this, and it does it with an iron hand, which is very common with most mass religions, that is, each one states they have a hold on truth, the Absolute Truth.

I have found that most conservatives shun this anthropological framing of liberalism as a religion, perhaps because there is one aspect of liberalism that is different than Judeo-Christian religions. Liberalism does not preach anything about a God, neither does it claim to be a religion. This does not mean it does not function just like one. And what a sorry, corrupt religion it is.


Comments: Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?