Thursday, October 05, 2006
...essential for society to reckon with the fact that homos and bisexuals perpetrate all kinds of harassment and violence in society, including to minors of all ages.
And straight folks don't? Are all homosexuals into boys? How do you figure? Since I'm straight, am I into little girls? Are all blond, 20-something, married highschool teachers trying to hook up with their students?
My point: Your sweeping generalizations lack any substance, and your posts make you look like a hate monger.
The current pro-homo propaganda line goes, "sexual abuse is perpetrated by heterosexuals, most of them married with kids. Homosexuals, on the other hand, are just slandered with this accusation, because they are never sexually exploitative or abusive of minors." A fine example of the pratice of this propaganda is the liberal screeching against the Boy Scouts prohibiting homos as scout leaders. Read what the ACLU and several homo activists have written about it and you will find that they all screeched that this « notion » that homos could actually be predatory to minors was just a « full-of-hate Christian gay-bashing » hysteria and that it never happens in reality.
Now, back to your comment - where do you completely distort the meaning of what I have written? In two fundamental ways:
Major distortion #1)If I say, "straight married people abuse kids," does it mean I am saying ALL straight married people are abusing kids? No.
If I say, "homos and bisexuals abuse kids," does it mean I am saying ALL non-heterosexuals abuse kids? No.
Read what I write - I have never written that ALL homos and bisexuals abuse kids for the very simple reason that 1) is not true, 2) I do not think it is true, 3) I have on various occasions explicitely clarified that it does not mean "all," but a certain number of the population. There are dozens of statements on my blog to that effect - but apparently you just read one thing and with your prejudiced fanatical mind, it's you who makes the wrong generalizations about what I write.
So, right now, we have a dominant discourse in society which promotes the idea that only straights abuse minors (and adults) and that non-heterosexuals are always victims of crimes, but never perpetrators. When I say that, « ...essential for society to reckon with the fact that homos and bisexuals perpetrate all kinds of harassment and violence in society, including to minors of all ages. » it is this distorted, fanatical pro-homo propaganda that I am referring to. What society needs to deal with are the real cases of homos and bisexuals who are exploitative and/or abusive to minors and this is not being done. The Foley case is a grand example. What we have the usual old excuses and cover-ups and more of the same lame propaganda.
The reason your pro-homo propaganda is so detrimental to society is because it reinforces all the mechanisms of silencing the victims of exploitation and abuse by non-heterosexuals. It also becomes an almost complete impediment for them to make denounciations – why denounce a sexual harassment case or abuse case by non-heterosexuals, when people like you are 1) going to say this simply does not happen in society, 2) going to accuse the victims of being homophobic and gay-hate-mongers?
« Are all homosexuals into boys? How do you figure? »
I don't figure that, and I hope you are not dishonest to the point of continuing to affirm this nonsense after I took the time to clarify just how you misinterpreted what I wrote.
« Are all blond, 20-something, married highschool teachers trying to hook up with their students? »
No, but there is definitely a major cover-up of the great majority of the ones who do. AND the cover-up is even more accute if the abusive teacher happens to be non-heterosexual. Because liberals care more about their fanatical homosexuality ideology than the well-being of minors.
« My point: Your sweeping generalizations lack any substance, and your posts make you look like a hate monger.
It's actually your sweeping misinterpretations of what I wrote that are incorrect.
Given that pro-homos are always repeating these same misinterpretations, it just makes them look very shoddy and dishonest in their approach to this debate.
Maybe because they can't face what is being written without distorting it? Lack of any sound arguments? Don't want to face some ugly truths about pro-homosexuals?
Do you hate all homosexuals? Do you think that all homosexuals are violent or predatory towards children or in other ways? What do you propose that be done about the homosexual problem? It seems that you want them barred from holding public office and to be forced to be publically identified as homosexuals. How do you propose to do this?
Big E - It's clear you made the same mistakes as "paully."
No, I don't hate all homosexuals. My objection is to people who perpetrate a system of sexual harassment, abuse, and violence - and these people come in all shapes, sizes, and ideological orientations. Current pro-homo propaganda and attitudes are a fundamental part of the larger system of sexual exploitation and violence in the world and if you read my blog, you will find 300 discussions on why. Do you hate all people who are not hypocrites like yourself regarding current systems of sexual violence ?
"Do you think that all homosexuals are violent or predatory towards children or in other ways?"
No, read response to "paully." And three thousand other blog entries to that effect.
" What do you propose that be done about the homosexual problem? "
The same thing I think should be done about the heterosexual and bisexual problem. Expose all the Foleys of every ideological and sexuality categories of the world. You are too much of a coward to do that, aren't you? You'd rather put your energies into a nice, old-fashioned cover-up of every sexual harassment and sexual abuse case that occurs.
"It seems that you want them barred from holding public office and to be forced to be publically identified as homosexuals. "
I don't want anyone who perpetrates a system of sexual exploitation and violence, a diseased personal or sexual ideology to hold office, to be in a position of power, to be in a decision making position, to be in academia. Therefore, a straight pro-homo who is part of this machine of cover-ups and denials and distortions shouldn't hold office - along with all the other pro-homos and anti-pro-homos who for various reasons do the same thing.
I am totally in favor of identifying everyone, not just homosexuals, bisexuals as well, and not just regarding sexual ideology, let's out everyone regarding prostitution, sexual harassment, pornography, SM, bestiality, etc. Are you so afraid of the truth about people? Of exposing their hypocrisy? Of outing the predators and exploiters of various kinds?
What are you so afraid of knowing about? Or is it that you are already involved in so many criminal and unethical cover-ups that you have to attack people who want transparency and ethics in public and private spheres?